Update:
Since the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) continues to have its position on direct shipping interpreted wrongly across the country, they have sought to clarify it.  Recently, they have written to one attorney  asking for clarity to avoid stating that the the full NCSL had endorsed a wine model shipping legislation.  Click here for the letter.
Â
SUPREME COURT [...]

Posted March 8, 2010 by admin under 21st Amendment, Alcohol Regulation, Dormant Commerce Clause, Supreme Court

In a very forceful advisory, the California Attorney General has made it clear that California law does not allow suppliers to micromanage and control distributor licensees.  This guidance apparently went to over 600 importers and suppliers.Â
The staff of the attorney general actually  spent time reviewing the proposed supplier contracts to state law and were very concerned about [...]

Posted February 15, 2010 by admin under 21st Amendment, Alcohol Regulation, Alcohol Review, Guest Columns

Well the sordid ten year history of the TFWS case is over.  There will be no appeal to the United States Supreme Court.   In order to save the state money from attorneys fees, the state will not appeal in exchange for not having to pay attorney fees.  In a fee settlement agreement filed with the court the [...]

Posted January 13, 2010 by admin under 21st Amendment, Alcohol Regulation, Alcohol Review, Supreme Court

UPDATE:  The Supreme Court has denied certiorari in this 6th Circuit matter.  Cert denial can be found here.
Update:  TN brief below.   Supreme Court to decide whether to take this the week of September 29, 2009.
A pairing of lawyer and wine connoisseur has lead to the U.S. Supreme Court  being asked whether limitations imposed by Tennessee [...]

Posted October 5, 2009 by admin under 21st Amendment, Alcohol Regulation, Alcohol Review, Dormant Commerce Clause, Supreme Court

If you sell liquor to consumers in New Mexico, you need to be licensed by the state to do so. Period.
United States District Judge M. Christinia Armijo has rejected US Airways claims that federal aviation statutes and regulations (specifically the Airline Deregulation Act and the Federal Aviation Act) preempt New Mexico laws requiring every person [...]

Posted October 2, 2009 by admin under 21st Amendment, Alcohol Regulation, Alcohol Review

Washington Liquor Control Board filed its notice of appeal to the 9th Circuit on the issue of paying nearly all of the attorney fees to Costco despite winning 7/9 of  the litigation.  Their notice is here.   Also, the Washington Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association filed their notice of appeal as well.  Their appeal is here.
The chilling [...]

Posted September 17, 2009 by admin under 21st Amendment, Alcohol Regulation, Alcohol Review

On September 15th, the 9th Circuit heard oral arguments of a wineries appeal of an Arizona district court’s decision upholding the state’s winery laws.   Click here if you would like  to hear the oral argument while you eat lunch at your desk.   It appears one of the judges is not all with the state, one is silent and one [...]

Posted September 17, 2009 by admin under 21st Amendment, Alcohol Regulation, Alcohol Review, Dormant Commerce Clause

There is a new Illinois lawsuit seeking to stop the recently enacted increases in beer, wine and spirits taxes.   There are several arguments advanced in the complaint.  Of interest to me is its discussion of beer taxes vs. wine/liquor taxes.  In a new twist on the long running equilization debate, the plaintiff claims it is [...]

Posted September 1, 2009 by admin under Alcohol Regulation, Alcohol Review

Very disappointing but not surprising decision from 4th Circuit today ruling against the state on the Maryland laws on price posting , price holdand quantity discount ban.   This decision seemed to be a certainty when an entire new panel of 4th Circuit judges came out for oral argument.   Personally, I think the court just wanted to [...]

Tags: 4th Circuit, Costco, liquor regulations, Maryland, NBWA, oral arguments, Sherman Anti trust
Posted July 15, 2009 by admin under 21st Amendment, Alcohol Regulation, Alcohol Review, Supreme Court

I am not sure how long this order-of-dismissal will stand but apparently a judge in South Carolina decided that  the laws against minor’s possesion of alcohol or consuming alcohol  are unconsititutional.    This will go to a higher court for a second opinion.  Here is an article about this decision.

Posted July 15, 2009 by admin under Alcohol Regulation